Trump doesn’t need an intervention; he needs to be put in timeout
I see where some Republican leaders, and I use the term leaders loosely, are proposing an intervention with their party's nominee.
Wouldn't a “timeout” be more appropriate?
Steve Seldomridge, Longs
This story was originally published August 16, 2016 at 10:33 AM with the headline "Trump doesn’t need an intervention; he needs to be put in timeout."