Should Hillary Clinton be president or jailed?

Hillary Clinton has a political name. She has a political background. She’s a former first lady, for goodness sake.

Should she be the next president? Or, should she be in jail for having classified documents on a personal e-mail server that made secrets available to any skilled hacker?

Surge staffers debate the pros and cons of another Clinton in the Oval Office.

HILLARY HOO-RAH

Any woman who can endure through the scandals of cigar-loving Bill surely has the mettle to be president.

Hillary is a strong-willed woman who has experience with national programs as a first lady and secretary of state. She is the only former first lady to hold a Cabinet position.

Her service for the Obama administration will allow the country to continue on a steady course it has enjoyed over the last 8 years. Perhaps then, government programs and policies will have a chance to take hold for the benefit of all.

Clinton’s knowledge should make her a favorite candidate in the 2016 election.

ARE YOU KIDDING?

Knowledge?

Would you want a person running the country who discussed classified documents over personal e-mail?

The country needs a leader strong and with impeccable morals. Give us Conoleeza Rice any day over Hillary.

Let us also not forget that Clinton was responsible for the security lapses that led to the Benghazi attacks and death of a U.S. ambassador.

Now, really, should there be any debate on whether this woman should be president?

SOUND OFF

What’s your opinion? Tell us on this post at Facebook.com/weeklysurge.

This story was originally published October 14, 2015 at 9:21 AM with the headline "Should Hillary Clinton be president or jailed?."