OK, let's make sure we have this straight.
An oil rig operated by British Petroleum explodes in the Gulf of Mexico.
Eleven people die. As much as 2.5 million gallons of BP oil gushes into the Gulf every day. Fragile eco-systems are wrecked, sea life is slimed, fishermen and boaters who make their living from the Gulf are facing ruin, and BP, we discover, had no real plan for handling a catastrophe of this magnitude.
So we should apologize to BP?
That was the astonishing, incomprehensible and galling conclusion of Texas Rep. Joe Barton last week in a congressional hearing. He was reacting to news President Obama had secured from BP a $20 billion escrow fund to help those whose lives were upended by the spill. You'd think that was a good thing, but Barton told BP CEO Tony Hayward, "I apologize. I do not want to live in a country where anytime a citizen or a corporation does something that is legitimately wrong is subject to some sort of political pressure that ... amounts to a shakedown. So I apologize."
Hours later, under fire from Democrats and his fellow Republicans, Barton apologized. Indeed, the gaffe was a gift to Democrats, who wasted no time hammering the GOP with it. Why not? The apology plays right into the narrative of a GOP snugly in the pocket of Big Oil. Barton alone has accepted more than $100,000 in donations from that industry just since 2009. And according to the non-partisan Center for Responsive Politics, oil interests have given him more than $1.4 million since 1990 -- more than any other representative.
As we can plainly see, he works hard for the money.
Still, it seems short-sighted to frame this only in the context of one politician. From S.C. Rep. James Clyburn, who's received $145,000 from the utilities industry since 2009, to South Dakota Sen. Tim Johnson, who's received $322,000 since 2005 from insurance companies, there is no shortage of lawmakers who work hard for the corporate money. America's democracy has become a pay-to-play system in which lack of money equals invisibility and muteness. The solution is obvious: public funding of all national political campaigns.
How else will these people know who they work for? And isn't that ultimately the crux of Joe Barton's confusion?
Every election cycle politicians flood the airwaves with commercials that show them walking and talking with the common folk who listen with rapt attention.
The final shot frames the candidate with a flag in the background as he or she gazes soulfully into the middle distance and promises to work on our behalf, to always be on our side.
They pretend to mean it and we pretend to believe it.
But last week, Joe Barton didn't even care enough to pretend. Instead, he stood tall against the people and environment of the Gulf Coast, and with the industry that gave him $1.4 million.
There is a certain raw truth in that image that blasts all pretense away.
As he genuflects before his corporate masters, Barton also reflects the ugly underside of American politics.
And validates an ancient axiom that suddenly sounds like a warning:
You get what you pay for.
Contact Pitts at email@example.com.