Letter to the editor

Church split more complex than portrayed

February 4, 2013 

  • Agree? Disagree? We want to know The Sun News invites readers to share their views with us and others. Letters to The Sun News should include the writer’s contact information, and those 150 words or less will be given priority. Letters may be edited for taste, clarity, grammar and length. The Sun News will consider longer letters on community, regional and statewide issues and select some for publication. Writers will be allowed one letter per every 30 days. The Sun News avoids publishing: • Letters that contain questionable or undocumented facts. • Copies of letters sent to someone else. • Letters that contain inappropriate attacks on individuals or groups. • Letters about disputes between individuals and businesses. • Anonymous letters. The Sun News may not publish letters on subjects that already have received exhaustive discussion in the letters column. Email letters to opinions@thesunnews.com. Submit them online at MyrtleBeachOnline.com/opinion. Mail them to The Sun News, Letters to the Editor, P.O. Box 406, Myrtle Beach, SC 29578. Fax them to 843-626-0356. Due to the volume of letters received, we cannot acknowledge receipt of every letter.

Re Jan. 30 column by Issac Bailey, “Maybe political Christians must part ways”

Issac Bailey, before offering, as a single issue, the secularist view about the controversy between the Episcopal Diocese of South Carolina and the theology of the national Episcopal Church, should have taken the time to actually determine the facts and real issues in contention, many of which date back more than 70 years.

Contrary to the viewpoint presented in recent media articles, by the dissidents, and, now, by Mr. Bailey as their apparent spokesperson, the roots of the split concern much more fundamental theological issues than so-called gay rights and marriage.

The dissident faction has made a straw man issue of gay rights to deflect attention from the much deeper issues of the current direction of church theology and belief. An enumeration of the many areas and canonical positions in dispute is beyond the scope of this brief response, but when a “governing” church body, as just one example, questions the actual divinity of Jesus Christ there are much deeper theological issues involved than mere questions about acceptance of gay marriage and ordination.

Bailey’s simplistic presentation of this controversy as simply one of differing political viewpoints on a single issue does not only a disservice to readers but snidely implies ignorant, intolerant bigotry to those not accepting the latest social viewpoint du jour.

Bailey no doubt subscribes to a “living theology” as he seemingly does to a “living Constitution” for the country at-large. However, contrary to Mr. Bailey’s flexible relativistic viewpoint, certain truths reflect a reality that is immutable, irrespective of current “progressive” insights.

May I suggest that in any future articles on Episcopal theological issues that Mr. Bailey take the time to in fact research the issues in depth rather than regurgitate the dissident talking points presented to him.

The writer lives in Conway.

Myrtle Beach Sun News is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service