Why not outcry about lives lost to abortion?

January 11, 2013 

Most sensitive, caring individuals were horrified at the recent slaughter of innocent children in Newtown, Conn. The media gave it nonstop coverage. After all, these were sweet little human beings who had not yet lost their baby teeth. We watched the heart-wrenching sobs of loving parents who could not fathom the idea that anyone would want to take the life of their most precious child. The nation rallied around this community which, like so many others across the country, seemed to be the last place where such a horrendous tragedy would occur. This is exactly the reaction we would and should expect when the life of a child is taken.

Every day in this country the lives of thousands of innocent children are taken. Why is there no public outcry? Is it more acceptable because the mother chose to end the life of her child? Is it less horrendous because the child had no name? Is it more tolerable because the murder took place in a sterile environment without the attention of the media? These are children who have not yet cut their baby teeth. They are unborn human beings, not unborn kittens, dogs, zebras, or elephants.

There has been a nationwide response of shock and anger at the tragedy in Newtown and rightly so. Some have blamed our lack of attention to the mentally ill. Some blame our relaxed gun laws. Who is to blame for the thousands of lives sacrificed through abortion? And, more to the point, why do we refuse to protect all of our children?

The writer lives in Myrtle Beach.

Myrtle Beach Sun News is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service