Myrtle Beach Online - News, Sports & Entertainment from The Sun News
Myrtle Beach Online's Mug Shots Index Career Builder
Search for

Web Search powered by YAHOO!
News - Local

Tuesday, Jan. 10, 2012

Federal judge puts SC immigration lawsuit on hold

- The Associated Press
email this story to a friend E-Mail print story Print 0 comments Reprint or license
Text Size:

tool name

close
tool goes here

COLUMBIA -- A federal judge in South Carolina has halted a lawsuit over the state’s tough new immigration law pending the outcome of a U.S. Supreme Court decision on a similar challenge in Arizona.

U.S. District Judge Richard Gergel issued the order Monday after receiving requests to do so from both federal prosecutors and attorneys representing South Carolina. The federal government and the American Civil Liberties Union last year sued South Carolina, challenging the constitutionality of the new law.

Some portions of the law went into effect as scheduled on Jan. 1, including a requirement that businesses check new hires’ legal status through a federal system. Businesses that knowingly violate the law could have their operating licenses revoked.

Similar stories:

  • S.C. prosecutor appealing ruling on immigration law

  • Judge halts parts of SC immigrant law

  • Judge says ruling to come on SC immigration law

  • Federal judge considers immigration case Monday

  • Parts of S.C. immigration law blocked by federal judge

South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson, who is representing the state, had originally asked that the entire law be allowed to take effect Jan. 1 while the lawsuit goes forward, but Gergel turned down that request last month before blocking several key provisions.

Last month, Gergel blocked sections that make it a state crime not to carry immigration paperwork or for illegal immigrants to transport or house themselves.

The judge also blocked a requirement that officers check the immigration status of people they pull over if officers suspect they are in the country illegally.

The Obama administration challenged the Arizona law, arguing that regulating immigration is the job of the federal government, not states. The Department of Justice also challenged similar laws in Alabama and Utah. Civil liberties and immigrant rights groups also sued over measures in those states, as well as in Georgia and Indiana.

A judge has blocked a similar portion of Arizona’s law, after which South Carolina’s legislation was modeled. That state’s appeal is now pending before the U.S. Supreme Court, and prosecutors have said justices will likely rule in the first half of this year.

A federal appeals court has denied requests by Georgia and Alabama to delay action on legal challenges to their own new illegal immigration laws pending the outcome of the high court decision.

Subscribe to The Sun News Print Edition
The Sun News allows readers to comment on stories as a privilege; the views expressed in story comments are not those of the Sun News or its staff. Readers are required to adhere to all commenting policies, and must avoid commenting behavior such as personal attacks, libelous posts or inappropriate remarks. Users in violation of The Sun News' commenting policies can have their comments blocked, removed, and/or ultimately see their account banned from the site. Some comments may be reprinted in the newspaper. Registered user names will be posted with comments.
The Sun News Terms & Conditions and Commenting Policies can be reviewed here.
   Connect with Us:
Connect with The Sun News on Twitter
Connect with The Sun News on Facebook
Sign up for The Sun News' newsletters, breaking and local news straight to your email inbox
Get up to the minute news from The Sun News Text Alerts.
Get late-breaking Weather News from The Sun News' Weather Text Alerts
Get The Sun News Newspaper online everyday, just as it appears in print
Subscribe too our RSS feeds
Twitter Facebook News
Letters
Text
Alerts
Weather Alerts Daily
E -Edition
RSS
 
Events Calendar:
Career Builder Quick Job Search
Quick Job Search
Top Jobs