Myrtle Beach Online - News, Sports & Entertainment from The Sun News
Myrtle Beach Online's Mug Shots Index Career Builder
Search for

Web Search powered by YAHOO!
Business

Friday, Dec. 16, 2011

SEC sues former Fannie and Freddie execs for fraud

- Washington Bureau
email this story to a friend E-Mail print story Print 0 comments Reprint or license
Text Size:

tool name

close
tool goes here

WASHINGTON -- The Securities and Exchange Commission announced a dramatic lawsuit on Friday alleging that six former top executives of mortgage finance titans Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac committed fraud by authorizing misleading statements about their balance sheets.

Fannie and Freddie were congressionally chartered private companies with implicit government backing until they were put into government receivership by the Bush administration in September 2008.

That move came at the start of a global financial crisis that has proved to be the worst since the Great Depression. The financial crisis was triggered by excessive subprime mortgages given to the weakest borrowers, and former Fannie and Freddie executives now stand accused of deliberately misleading about their exposure to these subprime loans.

Similar stories:

“Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac executives told the world that their exposure was substantially smaller than it really was,” Robert Khuzami, director of the SEC's enforcement division, said in a statement “These material misstatements occurred during a time of acute investor interest in financial institutions' exposure to subprime loans, and misled the market about the amount of risk on the company's books. All individuals, regardless of their rank or position, will be held accountable for perpetrating half-truths or misrepresentation about matters materially important to the interest of our country's investors.”

In Friday's statement, the SEC said Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac had each entered into a non-prosecution agreement with the SEC, accepting responsibility without dispute for the actions of their former executives. It frees the agencies from costly and embarrassing civil prosecution.

The securities fraud charges were lodged in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. In one complaint, fraud charges were leveled against former Fannie Mae CEO Daniel Mudd, his former chief risk officer, Enrico Dallavecchia, and Thomas Lund, the former executive vice president for Fannie's single-family mortgage business.

In the second complaint, in the same court and against Freddie Mac, the SEC alleged fraud by former CEO and Chairman Richard Syron, former Executive Vice President and Chief Business Officer Patricia Cook, and Donald Bisenius, the former executive vice president for Freddie's single-family guarantee business.

The SEC is seeking unspecified financial penalties, return of ill-gotten gains with interest and a bar against the executives serving as officers or directors of companies. That's a big potential hit on Mudd, who is now CEO of the investment firm Fortress Investment Group.

In a blistering response Friday, Mudd – the son of legendary television newsman Roger Mudd – said politics was behind the SEC action.

“The SEC is wrong,” Mudd said in a statement read on CNBC television, adding that he was sure the courts would consider “fairness and reason, not politics,” in his case.

The SEC alleged Fannie executives engaged in fraud when they withheld information and abetted others in providing misleading information to investors about subprime exposure between December 2006 and August 2008. The alleged fraud for Freddie Mac executives occurred between March 2007 and August 2008. The agency alleges both mortgage finance giants said they had limited exposure to subprime loans in the billions, but actually had exposure in the tens and even hundreds of billions.

Aside from masking its true exposure to subprime loans on its books, the SEC alleged, Fannie executives also made misrepresentations about exposure to Alt-A loans, which were one step up the credit quality ladder from subprime loans.

“The misleading disclosures were made as Fannie Mae's executives were seeking to increase the company's market share through increased purchases of subprime and Alt-A loans, and gave false comfort to investors,” the SEC alleged Friday.

The SEC's Khuzami is under fire for a recent decision by a federal judge on Nov. 28 to reject his $285 million settlement with Citibank on similar charges of malfeasance involving the sale of a $1 billion collateralized debt obligation, a complex security backed by shaky subprime mortgages that soaked investors.

The Citi settlement was considerably lower than the $550 million Goldman Sachs paid to settle similar complaints against its collateralized debt obligation sales to investors. U.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff called the fines on Citi “pocket change,” tossed out the settlement and ordered a July trial. The SEC announced Thursday it would appeal.

Fannie and Freddie together own or back more than half of the nation's mortgage debt. Fannie Mae was created in 1938 to boost home ownership after the Great Depression, while Freddie Mac was created in 1970 to provide more competition.

The two bundle mortgages together and offer them to investors as mortgage bonds in a secondary market. This gets home loans off of the books of banks, allowing them to continue lending. For decades, the bonds – called agency mortgage-backed securities – were plain-vanilla investments that central banks and investors bought without incident.

From the late 1990s forward, Wall Street investment banks aggressively got into the business of packaging mortgages into bonds – called private-label mortgage-backed securities. By 2006 they had effectively halved Fannie and Freddie's share of the secondary market thanks to subprime loans.

Data from the Federal Reserve shows that more than 84 percent of the subprime mortgages in 2006 were issued by private lenders, routed mostly to Wall Street firms, who bundled them into private mortgage bonds. Data from the specialty publication Inside Mortgage Finance showed that in 2005 and 2006, the height of the boom years, Wall Street firms bundled two-thirds of new mortgages, supplanting Fannie and Freddie.

But shortly before the financial crisis, Fannie and Freddie tried to recover some of that lost ground, loosening what had been tighter standards than those applied by Wall Street. And that's where the SEC complaints were focused.

Subscribe to The Sun News Print Edition
The Sun News allows readers to comment on stories as a privilege; the views expressed in story comments are not those of the Sun News or its staff. Readers are required to adhere to all commenting policies, and must avoid commenting behavior such as personal attacks, libelous posts or inappropriate remarks. Users in violation of The Sun News' commenting policies can have their comments blocked, removed, and/or ultimately see their account banned from the site. Some comments may be reprinted in the newspaper. Registered user names will be posted with comments.
The Sun News Terms & Conditions and Commenting Policies can be reviewed here.
   Connect with Us:
Connect with The Sun News on Twitter
Connect with The Sun News on Facebook
Sign up for The Sun News' newsletters, breaking and local news straight to your email inbox
Get up to the minute news from The Sun News Text Alerts.
Get late-breaking Weather News from The Sun News' Weather Text Alerts
Get The Sun News Newspaper online everyday, just as it appears in print
Subscribe too our RSS feeds
Twitter Facebook News
Letters
Text
Alerts
Weather Alerts Daily
E -Edition
RSS
 
Events Calendar:
Career Builder Quick Job Search
Quick Job Search
Top Jobs
Featured Advertisers