Myrtle Beach Online - News, Sports & Entertainment from The Sun News
Myrtle Beach Online's Mug Shots Index Career Builder
Search for

Web Search powered by YAHOO!
News - Local

Wednesday, Apr. 07, 2010

Nuclear plant faces new hurdle

Utility asked to justify extra fund

- The Associated Press
email this story to a friend E-Mail print story Print 0 comments Reprint or license
Text Size:

tool name

close
tool goes here

COLUMBIA -- South Carolina regulators overstepped their authority when they let a utility include a $438 million contingency fund in its estimate of the costs of building a nuclear plant, an attorney for a group of industrial power users told the state Supreme Court on Tuesday.

Scott Elliott, attorney for S.C. Energy Users, said if the contingency fund is allowed to stand, South Carolina Electric & Gas customers will have no guarantee the money will be spent wisely as required by the law allowing the company to recoup the costs of building new power plants.

"We have no idea what the costs are or whether they will be incurred," Elliott said at a hearing before the court.

Similar stories:

Justice Don Beatty said it sounded like regulators were giving SCE&G a "slush fund" to spend as it pleases.

SCE&G attorney Belton Zeigler said the South Carolina Office of Regulatory Staff would monitor all expenditures on the reactors.

The contingency costs were included in a rate increase regulators approved last year. The company is charging electricity customers an average of 2.5 percent more each year over 10 years to help pay for the $10 billion project at its V.C. Summer nuclear facility in Jenkinsville.

SCE&G is building the new reactors with state-owned utility Santee Cooper, which also is a partner in the reactor currently operating at the facility.

Zeigler argued that the law allowing the company to recoup its financing costs before building the plant was intended to make it easier to build nuclear reactors.

"The real question is do we want to make nuclear power possible in this state," Zeigler said.

The high court heard another challenge to the plant last month from an environmental group saying regulators should have given SCE&G's request greater scrutiny because it's the first time a company has been allowed to charge for a plant before it has been built.

The justices gave no indication of when they would issue a ruling in either case. As in the previous case, Chief Justice Jean Toal recused herself and was replaced by retired Justice James Moore of Greenwood.

Subscribe to The Sun News Print Edition
The Sun News allows readers to comment on stories as a privilege; the views expressed in story comments are not those of the Sun News or its staff. Readers are required to adhere to all commenting policies, and must avoid commenting behavior such as personal attacks, libelous posts or inappropriate remarks. Users in violation of The Sun News' commenting policies can have their comments blocked, removed, and/or ultimately see their account banned from the site. Some comments may be reprinted in the newspaper. Registered user names will be posted with comments.
The Sun News Terms & Conditions and Commenting Policies can be reviewed here.
   Connect with Us:
Connect with The Sun News on Twitter
Connect with The Sun News on Facebook
Sign up for The Sun News' newsletters, breaking and local news straight to your email inbox
Get up to the minute news from The Sun News Text Alerts.
Get late-breaking Weather News from The Sun News' Weather Text Alerts
Get The Sun News Newspaper online everyday, just as it appears in print
Subscribe too our RSS feeds
Twitter Facebook News
Letters
Text
Alerts
Weather Alerts Daily
E -Edition
RSS
 
Events Calendar:
Career Builder Quick Job Search
Quick Job Search
Top Jobs