Some original founders of Hard
Rock Park said Thursday they
still have intellectual property
rights over the park's overall
concept and want an annual
$500,000 licensing fee and
royalties from the park's new
owners, who bought the park
out of bankruptcy last month,
according to court documents.
FPI MB Entertainment, the
group that purchased the park
for $25 million, said the
compensation request not only
threatens the reopening of the
park, planned to be by
Memorial Day, but the
attraction's entire existence.
At issue is whether the rights
to the layout, design and theme
of some of the park's attractions
and the park itself were
transferred with the park's
assets to the new owners by the
federal bankruptcy court in
Delaware.
Ultimately, that will be up to
a judge to decide. A hearing is
scheduled for 11 a.m. today.
``It certainly is possible to
separate intellectual property
from the physical assets . . . that
were sold,'' said Richard
Stolker, a bankruptcy lawyer at
Uptown Law in Rockville, Md.
``Now whether that was done or
not, you'd have to look at the
documents that were filed.''
The new owners say the sale
of the park was approved by the
bankruptcy court ``free and
clear of all encumbrances,''
indicating the intellectual property rights
were transferred to them. They
say the founders also have no
more rights over the park
because they failed to object to
the original sale order.
The founders say the park's
intellectual property did not
belong to HRP Myrtle Beach
Operations, one of the
corporations that filed for
bankruptcy, and thus could not
have been transferred. Instead,
they say the rights belong to
HRP Creative Services Co., a
separate corporation set up by
the founders and one that never
filed for bankruptcy.
HRP Creative Services was
incorporated in Florida.
According to the Web site of
that state's Division of
Corporations, the park's
founders _ Jon Binkowski,
Felix Mussenden and Steven
Goodwin _ are partners in the
corporation. Goodwin served as
CEO of the park.
In an e-mail to the park's new
owners that was included in the
court documents, Goodwin asks
for the licensing fee and for 1.5
percent of gross revenues over
$50 million. Goodwin says that
is a ``fair offer'' for such a
``magnificent park.''
``I find it inconceivable that
you can consider opening the
park in 2009 without securing
an agreement with us to utilize
our intellectual property, as the
cost and time to strip out our
creative content from the park
would seem to rule out such a
course of action,'' Goodwin
wrote on March 1 to FPI MBE.
HRP Myrtle Beach
Operations gave HRP Creative
Services similar compensation
for the intellectual property
rights, according to court
documents, though Goodwin
headed both corporations and
signed for both of them in the
agreement between the two,
which was finalized in 2006.
In their court filing, the
founders say even changing the
names of the rides would violate
their rights if no licensing fee
were paid.
Dennis Drebsky, an attorney
representing HRP Creative
Services, said Goodwin was not
trying to hinder the opening of
the park.
``From the point of view of
Steve, he'd like the park to go on
and be a success,'' Drebsky
said. ``That's not what we're
trying to do. He's just trying to
get fair compensation for what
his corporation owns.''
The motion filed by FPI MBE
says that Goodwin is ``trying to
shamefully unravel all that has
been accomplished after laying
behind the log'' when the court
originally approved the sale of
the park.
``Erstwhile silent, Goodwin
now belatedly claims that he and
his ill-conceived company . . .
actually still own the park's basic
DNA or alleged underlying
intellectual property,'' the new
owners' motion says. ``Not just
on some discrete level, but in a
most integral, wide-ranging and
all-inclusive manner.''
FPI MBE is asking the
bankruptcy court to affirm that
the founders waived their
intellectual property rights by
not objecting to the sale order,
that FPI MBE purchased all of
HRP Creative Services' rights
with the sale and for protection
against future litigation.
Representatives for the
park's buyers could not be
reached Thursday.
Stevan Lieberman, a
principal at Greenberg &
Lieberman, an intellectual
property law firm in
Washington, D.C., said it is not
uncommon for businesses to set
up a separate corporation to
hold their intellectual property
rights. In some circumstances,
though, doing so could be illegal.
``There are rules that say you
can't transfer something
knowing that there are debts
that have to be dealt with,'' he
said. ``That would be called a
fraudulent transfer.''
The $400 million park opened
in April and closed in
bankruptcy in September after
a lackluster first season. Two of
the original investors in the
park have also given financial
backing to FPI MBE, including
Tim Duncan, who also served
on the park's board of directors.
According to court
documents, Duncan will testify
today that Goodwin did not seek
board approval before
transferring the intellectual
rights to HRP Creative Services
and that the bankrupt
corporations, not HRP Creative
Services, paid for the filing fees
for the park's trademark
registrations.
The original owners of the
park licensed the Hard Rock
brand from Hard Rock
International for $2.5 million a
year and are not claiming any
rights over the Hard Rock Park
name. The new owners are still
negotiating with Hard Rock
International over whether the
name can be kept this year.
Contact MIKE CHERNEY at
444-1765.
The Sun News Terms & Conditions and Commenting Policies can be reviewed here.